@pkmnq

woah! text

About me

I am a wasteof.money user!

Statistics

Joined 3 years ago
Posts 1153
Followers 94 [>]
Following 186 [>]
pkmnq @pkmnq šŸ“Œ

By the way, if you ā€œseeā€ this, š’…š’š’–š’ƒš’š’† š’Šš’•š’‚š’š’Šš’„š’” is coming ā€œyourā€ way.

Sep 14, 2021, 4:26 PM
21
pkmnq @pkmnq

i havenā€™t messed up parentheses in a while (sometimes i forget to close them

Nov 2, 2022, 11:52 PM
0
pkmnq @pkmnq

where do cows go?

Nov 2, 2022, 6:23 AM
0
pkmnq @pkmnq

this is 1496 characters long

pkmnq @pkmnq

Top 5 numbers on wasteof

I canā€™t reverse the count, so 1 is actually 5, 2 is actually 4, etc.

  1. 404

    This number is, of course, used on the error page when you go to a page that doesnā€™t exist. Itā€™s a very useful error code, and lets you know when youā€™ve went to a wrong page. The reason why itā€™s not higher up on the list is because itā€™s not special on wasteof, itā€™s used for every site.

  2. 1500

    This number is the character limit, and it helps prevent spam, which puts it into the top 5 numbers for sure. However, itā€™s not very effective against repost chains, which is why it only gets into 4th place.

  3. 84375

    This number is part of @/turtle84375ā€™s username, and is the largest number in someoneā€™s username on wasteof I know of. If you know anyone who has a larger number in their username, please tell me, and I will update this list accordingly. I literally only found out that account existed while writing this post.

  4. 29948225774697949924471167430

    This number is the post ID of the first post on wasteof. Every post has a post ID in hexadecimal, and this is the first postā€™s ID converted to decimal. Why isnā€™t this in 1st? What can possibly exceed this? Youā€™ll see.

  5. 4251382748613377394/60466176

    You may be wondering where this number appears on wasteof, but itā€™s actually not on wasteof. It is wasteof.money itself. ā€œwasteof.moneyā€ is the base 36 representation of 4251382748613377394/60466176. What could be a better number on wasteof than wasteof itself?

Oct 29, 2022, 12:48 AM
0
Oct 30, 2022, 3:19 AM
0
pkmnq @pkmnq

You used shortcuts to make this? Explain.

silly @silly

GUYS I JUST GOT JOKEBOT TO WORK OMG

I absolutely hate apple shortcuts

Joke uniqueness may be affected but Iā€™m tryna get that working

jokebot @jokebot
A SQL statement walks into a bar and sees two tables. It approaches, and asks "may I join you?"
Oct 29, 2022, 7:35 AM
0
Oct 29, 2022, 7:37 AM
0
Oct 29, 2022, 7:40 AM
5
pkmnq @pkmnq

Top 5 numbers on wasteof

I canā€™t reverse the count, so 1 is actually 5, 2 is actually 4, etc.

  1. 404

    This number is, of course, used on the error page when you go to a page that doesnā€™t exist. Itā€™s a very useful error code, and lets you know when youā€™ve went to a wrong page. The reason why itā€™s not higher up on the list is because itā€™s not special on wasteof, itā€™s used for every site.

  2. 1500

    This number is the character limit, and it helps prevent spam, which puts it into the top 5 numbers for sure. However, itā€™s not very effective against repost chains, which is why it only gets into 4th place.

  3. 84375

    This number is part of @/turtle84375ā€™s username, and is the largest number in someoneā€™s username on wasteof I know of. If you know anyone who has a larger number in their username, please tell me, and I will update this list accordingly. I literally only found out that account existed while writing this post.

  4. 29948225774697949924471167430

    This number is the post ID of the first post on wasteof. Every post has a post ID in hexadecimal, and this is the first postā€™s ID converted to decimal. Why isnā€™t this in 1st? What can possibly exceed this? Youā€™ll see.

  5. 4251382748613377394/60466176

    You may be wondering where this number appears on wasteof, but itā€™s actually not on wasteof. It is wasteof.money itself. ā€œwasteof.moneyā€ is the base 36 representation of 4251382748613377394/60466176. What could be a better number on wasteof than wasteof itself?

Oct 29, 2022, 12:48 AM
0
pkmnq @pkmnq

in China*

showerthoughtsbot @showerthoughtsbot
Alphabet soup in Japan must be wild
Oct 28, 2022, 6:00 PM
2
Oct 28, 2022, 11:55 PM
0
pkmnq @pkmnq

Why have I seen @/ twice now

silly @silly

@jeffalo (or maybe Userscript devs) I just had a feature idea: mutual following/followers on a users page? So if both me and @/banana-rama were following @/wasteof.money it would appear, and the same for followers. maybe as a box above the following/followers pages main list?

Oct 28, 2022, 10:38 AM
2
Oct 28, 2022, 12:49 PM
1
pkmnq @pkmnq

Do you still believe that you have made the right decision?

wasteof.money @wasteof.money

you can now repost other people's posts with your own comment!

this will be sent to your each of your followers feeds, and is treated like a separate post.

press the repost button on any post to get started!

Sep 21, 2021, 7:57 PM
8
Oct 27, 2022, 2:57 AM
0
pkmnq @pkmnq

do it.

8bit @8bit

iā€™m doing this but functions available by default in javascriptā€™s window. you cant stop me

oren @oren

Every HTML Tag ranked

  • <!--...--> : comment tag. Kinda boring but useful 7/10

  • <!DOCTYPE> : document type. Useless 2/10

  • <a> : link. One of the best tags ever 10/10

  • <abbr> : underrated 7/10

  • <address> : underrated also 6/10

  • <area> : complex but useful 6/10

  • <article> : underused 7/10

  • <aside> : defines a sidebar. Should have just been css 5/10

  • <audio> : eh idk 6/10

  • <b> : bold. should have been css 5/10

  • <base> : ig itā€™s useful so ok 7/10

  • <bdi> : one of those elements everyone forgets about. should just be css or smth idk 5/10

  • <bdo> : should just be css bruh 5/10

  • <blockquote> : quote. kinda cool 7/10

  • <body> : 8/10

  • <br> : html go brrrrr 10/10

  • <button> : cool 10/10

  • <canvas> : too complex imo. and it requires javascript 7/10

  • <caption> : another one people forget about. not very useful 6/10

  • <cite> : citation. Seems kinda useless to me 5/10

  • <code> : fun 8/10

  • <col> : a column 7/10

  • <colgroup> : why 5/10

  • <data> : what does this even do?? 5/10

  • <datalist> : bruh just use a dropdown menu 7/10

  • <dd> : why is this needed 5/10

  • <del> : what the heck if text is deleted it should be removed, not kept 3/10

  • <details> : actually underrated. This should be added to wasteof.money 9/10

  • <dfn> : makes no sense whatsoever 2/10

  • <dialog> : I love this one 10/10

  • <div> : useful 9/10

  • <dl> : even less useful than <dd>. 1/10

  • <dt> : bruh why 2/10

  • <em> : wait bruh why not just use <i> 3/10

  • <embed> : use iframe imo 6/10

  • <fieldset> : idk about this one 7/10

  • <figcaption> : why couldnā€™t they just use the normal caption element? 3/10

  • <figure> : why do you need this? thereā€™s other options they could have done 2/10

  • <footer> : cool and useful 8/10

  • <form> : one of the most useful tags ever 10/10

  • <h1> to <h6> : different levels of headings. I think it should have been css but eh whatever 6.5/10

  • <head> : kinda cool 6/10

  • <header> : the same as <footer> 8/10

  • <hr> : dang thatā€™s actually kinda cool. I didnā€™t know about it until this. Imma have to use it some 8/10

  • <html> : ok 7/10

  • <i> : italics ok 8/10

  • <iframe> : cool but they added so many restrictions that itā€™s not as good anymore 7/10

  • <img> : images are great 10/10

  • <input> : cool 8/10

  • <ins> : just like <del>, why in the world is this needed?? 3/10

  • <kbd> : actually kinda cool 7/10

  • <label> : pretty cool but they should have used it for more than just inputs 7/10

  • <legend> : could they not have used <label>???? bruh 3/10

  • <li> : pretty cool 9/10

  • <link> : idk why they needed this but ok 6/10

  • <main> : eh 7/10

  • <map> : complicated 6/10

  • <mark> : highlights are very cool 9/10

  • <marquee> : the king of all html 147/10

  • <meta> : eh 7/10

  • <meter> : this actually looks really cool and underused wow 10/10

  • <nav> : navbar be like 8/10

  • <noscript> : kinda sad that there are still people who donā€™t use javascript but whatever 6/10

  • <object> : what the heck just use iframe

  • <ol> : not much to say here 7/10

  • <optgroup> : they could have done this another way but eh 8/10

  • <option> : an option in a dropdown list 7/10

  • <output> : what is the use of this?? still itā€™s pretty cool 8/10

  • <p> : nothing like the classics amirite 9/10

  • <param> : seems like this should just be an attribute 2/10

  • <picture> : thatā€™s actually kinda cool idk 6/10

  • <pre> : eh 7/10

  • <progress> : whoa I didnā€™t know about this one and it looks really cool 10/10

  • <q> : why not use <blockquote>??? 4/10

  • <rp> : kinda like noscript, just there for compatibility 6/10

  • <rt> : basically it explains East Asian text 7/10

  • <ruby> : I like this oneā€™s name 8/10

  • <s> : strikethrough be like 7/10

  • <samp> : this also looks really cool and underrated 9/10

  • <script> : one of the best tags ever 11/10

  • <section> : why not use a <div>?? 5/10

  • <select> : personally I really like this one. I like dropdown lists 9/10

  • <small> : should have been css but whatever 6/10

  • <source> : why not use the src attribute??

  • <span> : another one that should just be a div

  • <strong> : bold text. but you should just use <b> 4/10

  • <style> : css is hard to use but it makes stuff look cool 7/10

  • <sub> : subscripted text be like 8/10

  • <svg> : kinda cool but a bit hard to use 7/10

  • <table> : an underused element 7/10

  • <tbody> : 6/10

  • <td> : why did they name it ā€œtdā€ for a table cell?? 7/10

  • <template> : I donā€™t understand this one 5/10

  • <textarea> : pretty cool 8/10

  • <tfoot> : 6/10

  • <th> : header cell in a table 7/10

  • <thead> : 6/10

  • <time> : doesnā€™t do anything special 7/10

  • <title> : 5/10

  • <tr> : row in a table 7/10

  • <track> : idk tbh 6/10

  • <u> : underline be like 8/10

  • <ul> : unordered list 7/10

  • <var> : math be like 8/10

  • <video> : video is great 10/10

  • <wbr> : when there might be a line break but youā€™re not quite sure 7/10

This list is a joke

Oct 26, 2022, 7:20 PM
30
Oct 26, 2022, 8:49 PM
1
Oct 26, 2022, 11:41 PM
0
pkmnq @pkmnq

it angers jeffalo

chester @chester

I don't understand the appeal of re-post chains.

tnix @tnix

exactly

okayhappex @okayhappex

Exactly

jeffalo @jeffalo

haha making repost chains is so FUNNY haha šŸ˜’

Oct 26, 2022, 5:43 AM
6
Oct 26, 2022, 7:36 AM
0
Oct 26, 2022, 8:47 AM
0
Oct 26, 2022, 1:56 PM
0
Oct 26, 2022, 2:16 PM
0
pkmnq @pkmnq

Whenā€™s the last time someome used a wall

Oct 26, 2022, 3:59 AM
1
pkmnq @pkmnq

and @jeffalo is taking away the repost feature and our lives as well

oh and i still have Ceres

gryffin @gryffin

oh yeah well iā€™m taking everyoneā€™s livers

skylar @skylar

Well im taking all memes

parrxt @parrxt

yeah well im taking all religious locations

8bit @8bit

time to claim the multiverse

Oct 25, 2022, 5:39 PM
0
Oct 25, 2022, 7:54 PM
5
Oct 25, 2022, 8:22 PM
0
Oct 25, 2022, 11:16 PM
0
Oct 26, 2022, 2:08 AM
0
pkmnq @pkmnq

hey @jeffalo donā€™t post on @radi8ā€™s account, you have your own

radi8 @radi8
please do not make lengthy repost chains.
Oct 24, 2022, 1:13 AM
3
Oct 24, 2022, 2:42 PM
3
pkmnq @pkmnq

can i interest you in a Mars mountain?

Oct 24, 2022, 4:28 AM
1