Hot take: people spend way too much time talking about issues that don't matter, like LGBTQ and race (note: not to say that LGBTQ and race are unimportant issues. In fact, there needs to be equal rights and treatment in both categories. Just, comparatively, they are not as important), and way too little talking about things that really matter for the survival of humanity, like climate change and space travel.
comments
For real, When the Nashville school shooting happended, government people stated talking about how the shooter was trans, and the hormones he was on, and went on about trans rights rather then talking about how they are gonna prevent more school shooting. Imagine you just lost your son or daughter, and the event becomes a twitter argument rather then a real problem that needs to be stoped
yeah. we care more about politics and ideals than people now
for sure, at the end of the day, none of this really matters, and were just regular human beings
should edit the post to “we spend too much time talking about issues x,y etc (which are still important) compared to a,b which are just as important, we should spend equal time on them” to match something similiar to your retweet - this can be easily misinterpreted without your retweet for context
DID YOU JUST SAY RETWEET
All problems have the exact same amount of importance; Zero.
log off
you actually don’t learn do you
you log off as well mr “i'm not trans but i know everything about genders”
so you have to be trans to know everything about genders? Seems discriminatory to my fellow gender guru who’s gender is male! Maybe you should log off and think about your naughty antics.
bro i'm female
they are also straight sorry
I think @dertermenter was talking in third-person, as in how it’s discriminatory to him or something
Unless I misinterpreted it, in which case, sorry
But if it’s him misgendering you in this case, that’s pretty immature as a response
Attacking people instead of bringing up points in an argument doesn’t achieve anything
I’m not misgendering @lily lmao, my response was not referring to lily
I think the main problem is that whatever talk that DOES happen usually doesn’t go anywhere
It’s just people arguing but not reaching a consensus or compromise of both sides
Like, if you’re going to have bibles in class (even though religion should be separate), then you should allow books about equality and stuff too. It’s not equal to only allow books on an opinionated basis (whether they support your beliefs or not).
Personally, I don’t think either of those books should be introduced until much later. Sure, the point of books about equality is to teach children to be more accepting of people different from them. That behavior starts at home, though. If their parents teach them to only favor people with similar beliefs, the same race, sexuality, etc. then no amount of books will change that. It will make the parents angry and provide them an argument point, though.
This is just my perspective on it. Sorry it deviates quite a bit from the original topic.
I do think there’s talk about climate change / space travel, just not colloquially. But I’m sure scientists have been scrutinizing it for a while now, it’s just much more complicated (as it’s not simply a social problem), so it has fewer appearances in casual chats.
why do we need subjective stuff in school? just give books that contain facts (engineering, some science, math) and let the kids decide the rest for themselves
That’s what I’m saying
Then what about the kids who like the subjective stuff? They teach everything because different kids may have different interests and may want to do something different in future (unrelated to highschool science)
They should be able to choose extra classes they're interested in
How will they even have the interest if they aren’t exposed to it?
that is true