mybearworld @mybearworld

There are a lot of reasons to be unhappy about the Scratch Team. This isn't one of them.

Read: https://wasteof.money/posts/64c81058bcc44c58d9226533

obesityoftheold @obesityoftheold

My 3rd account, thatphysicsforumer, just got banned for “ban evading” and that I should log in to “physicsfanaticman” to learn more, when that account is deleted and that ban reason was the one mentioned below (the vague one of “your account is banned for breaking the community guidelines when I haven’t broke any) and that I had already got a contact-us response saying I could continue with that account.

Why do I deserve to be treated like this?

obesityoftheold @obesityoftheold

My first account, @obesityoftheold, got blocked for an “inappropriate username” (it’s because obesity is a problem amongst old people in the Netherlands) and now my 2nd account, PhysicsFanaticMan, got blocked for the following:

Your Scratch account has been blocked for continuing to break our Community Guidelines.

When I know I never broke any guidelines and they didn’t provide me with any comments that broke the guidelines?

After all my hard work on the forums with my posts the last week, this is how the Scratch Team treats me.

Jul 25, 2023, 9:30 PM
2
Jul 31, 2023, 3:52 PM
0
Jul 31, 2023, 5:23 PM
12

comments

he was banned for no reason though? that’s a reason to be unhappy with the scratch team

are you serious? The way they’ve been treated is disgraceful - why are you assuming that the scratch team are right?

that still doesn’t justify the scratch teams terrible treatment

They are severely understaffed and have way too big of a site to work on. Come on.

they aren’t understaffed, they’ve hired loads of new moderators recently, since a few moderate the forums and are complete dumbasses. And even so, it doesn’t cover up their mistakes in this situation at all. Imagine if you were a new user and your accounts got unfairly banned?

…Yeah. That’s a sign of being understaffed.

They used to be understaffed but aren’t now, or are at least less

See more replies