seems I missed the “every like this post gets, I will….” trend
and honestly I doubt more than 2 users actually did their challenge lmao
You forgot that he encourages obesity by selling his awful burgers and his chocolate bars, where he doesn’t use fairtrade and pay any of the workers who collect the chocolate since he pockets it all to pollute and destroy resources!
I’ve banned my kids from watching mrbeast from this.
Hot take: Mrbeast is the worst YouTuber of all time. He does poverty tourism for money to buy himself 50 lambos to shred, its unnaceptable.
he’s doing many other terrible things as shown in this video, it’s a must watch: https://youtu.be/JNmM4P9gKAQ?si=w0tNhaKWEEf2BcJ5
you know what…. I think you’re right…. oh at least people who are saying they aren’t interlinked are incorrect.
Elon is someone who loves attention so that probably explains that he may have purposefully explained what he meant a minute on, so news stations could take the original, out of context quote and dunk on him. Anything for attention for him!
Some people have been telling me that his first quote is unrelated to the second quote, but I believe it is, since in both of them he said it “was the only way he could think of to defend vast armies of bots”
"The single most important reason that we are moving to having a small monthly payment for the use of the X system, is it is the only way I could think of to combat vast armies of bots,"
… so pioritising posts written by by X premium subscribers, we’re actually gonna come out with a lower tier pricing so y’know, we’re wanting it to just be a small amount of money, that this is the (stumbles) it’s a longer discussion but in my view this is the only defense against vast armies of bots.
He says in both statements they are the only defense he could think of to combat bots, so if the statements were different, he would know 2 proposed defenses to combat bots, not 1. This is why I think that the 2 statements are interlinked with eachother and he was talking about a lower priced, premimum subscription all along, and that he was originally unclear.
Lads, I dislike Elon just as much as the next wasteof user, but this isn’t true.
People are just misinterpreting his comment. He just said that there may be a new tier of Twitter preminum that costs less.
Source: https://twitter.com/netanyahu/status/1703806204894498966 (this is the literal interview he did which people are saying he said this) Yes, the first quote on 34:40 seems to support @imadeanaccount’s claim, but if you go on (at about 35:30) he then seems to clarify he’s referring to a new, lower priced subscription.
Here is the quote:
… so pioritising posts written by by X premium subscribers, we’re actually gonna come out with a lower tier pricing so y’know, we’re wanting it to just be a small amount of money, that this is the (stumbles) it’s a longer discussion but in my view this is the only defense against vast armies of bots.
The reasoning that this proposed new lower tier of premium may happen is to combat bots, which was also mentioned in the original quote that people are alarmed over (people saying this quote is saying about putting twitter behind a paywall)
"The single most important reason that we are moving to having a small monthly payment for the use of the X system, is it is the only way I could think of to combat vast armies of bots,"
The reasonings correlating on both the quotes makes me believe he was originally talking about a lower, cheaper tier all along, and that he was just unclear.
trust the process, the issues will be fixed and all will be good. All good comes together.
kinda scared for my marching band comp this saturday because we only have 2 more rehearsals left until it and while it looks good it definitely has a lot of issues
Welp, the Scratch Team have ended it.
They somehow interpreted my comment of “I only did 1 interview and that was on an external site, not on Scratch” to “I was inviting people to go onto external sites”. They used this reasoning to deny my appeal. Wow.
I’m currently considering suing Scratch.
it’s like elon has a time bomb that goes off in 1 year to ruin everything about twitter or he dies
twitter is removing the ability to block users. they want to be wasteof so bad
lmao does that include me @scratchteam
(still no response)
Stalkers and Paedos when they find out on this another abysmal and unnecessary change:
twitter is removing the ability to block users. they want to be wasteof so bad
agreed, I would just like a “oh yeah you haven’t done any wrongdoing apart from the ‘inappropriate’ account name where we already said it’s fine for you to create a new account, feel free to continue using Scratch” yet they say this?
Scratch Team seem to like covering up their mishaps and also digging themselves into deeper holes in the process. It’s awful.
This is now disgraceful.
Scratch Team got back to me and said I was also banned since “I claimed to be an adult man who interviewed other Scratchers”
So, here you go guys. Adults aren’t allowed on Scratch, and you can’t interview other Scratchers.
Scratch Team is treating me like I’m a nonce when in reality I’m just a happy father who wanted to interact on a site that my son used and to help out the community. And this is the impression I have been given.
My 3rd account, thatphysicsforumer, just got banned for “ban evading” and that I should log in to “physicsfanaticman” to learn more, when that account is deleted and that ban reason was the one mentioned below (the vague one of “your account is banned for breaking the community guidelines when I haven’t broke any) and that I had already got a contact-us response saying I could continue with that account.
Why do I deserve to be treated like this?
My first account, @obesityoftheold, got blocked for an “inappropriate username” (it’s because obesity is a problem amongst old people in the Netherlands) and now my 2nd account, PhysicsFanaticMan, got blocked for the following:
Your Scratch account has been blocked for continuing to break our Community Guidelines.
When I know I never broke any guidelines and they didn’t provide me with any comments that broke the guidelines?
After all my hard work on the forums with my posts the last week, this is how the Scratch Team treats me.
This is now disgraceful.
Scratch Team got back to me and said I was also banned since “I claimed to be an adult man who interviewed other Scratchers”
So, here you go guys. Adults aren’t allowed on Scratch, and you can’t interview other Scratchers.
Scratch Team is treating me like I’m a nonce when in reality I’m just a happy father who wanted to interact on a site that my son used and to help out the community. And this is the impression I have been given.
My 3rd account, thatphysicsforumer, just got banned for “ban evading” and that I should log in to “physicsfanaticman” to learn more, when that account is deleted and that ban reason was the one mentioned below (the vague one of “your account is banned for breaking the community guidelines when I haven’t broke any) and that I had already got a contact-us response saying I could continue with that account.
Why do I deserve to be treated like this?
My first account, @obesityoftheold, got blocked for an “inappropriate username” (it’s because obesity is a problem amongst old people in the Netherlands) and now my 2nd account, PhysicsFanaticMan, got blocked for the following:
Your Scratch account has been blocked for continuing to break our Community Guidelines.
When I know I never broke any guidelines and they didn’t provide me with any comments that broke the guidelines?
After all my hard work on the forums with my posts the last week, this is how the Scratch Team treats me.
But “obesity” just describes someone’s weight - it’s not inherently a bad word. Also, the Scratch Team should’ve changed my name instead of deleting my account along with all my forum posts - all my work was destroyed!
It wasn’t for ban evading, it was for “continuing to break the guidelines” despite breaking none on that account, and don’t say “the guidelines you broke were you ban evading” since my ban page on obesityoftheold explicitly said “you are free to create a new account”
It was for ban evading but I had already used contact-us and they had given me the green light to continue using thatphysicsforumer - heck, they even apologised for the false ban on my second account! Yet they banned me today.
No hate to @mybearworld at all since it’s my fault for missing out a few details, but I feel that the Scratch Team are completely in the wrong.
ObesityOfTheOld was not a great name, but everything after that shouldn’t have happened. I didn’t know an OK was given to continue the account, and suspect a lack of moderator communication was at play here. I’m sorry for what I’ve said below.
People disagree (should’ve seen this coming honestly), the reason is that the first account, ObesityOfTheOld, was removed pretty fairly (not that great of a username, might’ve been done with good intentions? but also not really explained anywhere) PhysicsFanaticMan being banned for ban evading is reasonable. Banning ThatPhysicsForumer for ban evading is also reasonable, and accidentally redirecting to PhysicsFanaticMan is not a crime. Not sure why people feel the need to evade bans they feel unjust, that won’t help and you can’t blame the ST for taking action there.
There are a lot of reasons to be unhappy about the Scratch Team. This isn't one of them.
My 3rd account, thatphysicsforumer, just got banned for “ban evading” and that I should log in to “physicsfanaticman” to learn more, when that account is deleted and that ban reason was the one mentioned below (the vague one of “your account is banned for breaking the community guidelines when I haven’t broke any) and that I had already got a contact-us response saying I could continue with that account.
Why do I deserve to be treated like this?
My first account, @obesityoftheold, got blocked for an “inappropriate username” (it’s because obesity is a problem amongst old people in the Netherlands) and now my 2nd account, PhysicsFanaticMan, got blocked for the following:
Your Scratch account has been blocked for continuing to break our Community Guidelines.
When I know I never broke any guidelines and they didn’t provide me with any comments that broke the guidelines?
After all my hard work on the forums with my posts the last week, this is how the Scratch Team treats me.
My 3rd account, thatphysicsforumer, just got banned for “ban evading” and that I should log in to “physicsfanaticman” to learn more, when that account is deleted and that ban reason was the one mentioned below (the vague one of “your account is banned for breaking the community guidelines when I haven’t broke any) and that I had already got a contact-us response saying I could continue with that account.
Why do I deserve to be treated like this?
My first account, @obesityoftheold, got blocked for an “inappropriate username” (it’s because obesity is a problem amongst old people in the Netherlands) and now my 2nd account, PhysicsFanaticMan, got blocked for the following:
Your Scratch account has been blocked for continuing to break our Community Guidelines.
When I know I never broke any guidelines and they didn’t provide me with any comments that broke the guidelines?
After all my hard work on the forums with my posts the last week, this is how the Scratch Team treats me.
My first account, @obesityoftheold, got blocked for an “inappropriate username” (it’s because obesity is a problem amongst old people in the Netherlands) and now my 2nd account, PhysicsFanaticMan, got blocked for the following:
Your Scratch account has been blocked for continuing to break our Community Guidelines.
When I know I never broke any guidelines and they didn’t provide me with any comments that broke the guidelines?
After all my hard work on the forums with my posts the last week, this is how the Scratch Team treats me.
i’ve just joined this site as it is made by a scratch forumer and there seems to be a war between 2 users?
Is this site actually healthy?