For me, it's the opposite.
today the beginning of a challenging month
but now no griddy october is over yay
Jokes aside, my memory has clearly been getting worse and I have no idea why
I was going to say something about how bad my memory was getting recently but I forgot
I was going to say something about how bad my memory was getting recently but I forgot
so hiiiiiiigh
can we get much higher (or however it fuckin goes uhhh)
true
True
Every HTML Tag ranked
<!--...-->: comment tag. Kinda boring but useful 7/10<!DOCTYPE>: document type. Useless 2/10<a>: link. One of the best tags ever 10/10<abbr>: underrated 7/10<address>: underrated also 6/10<area>: complex but useful 6/10<article>: underused 7/10<aside>: defines a sidebar. Should have just been css 5/10<audio>: eh idk 6/10<b>: bold. should have been css 5/10<base>: ig it’s useful so ok 7/10<bdi>: one of those elements everyone forgets about. should just be css or smth idk 5/10<bdo>: should just be css bruh 5/10<blockquote>: quote. kinda cool 7/10<body>: 8/10<br>: html go brrrrr 10/10<button>: cool 10/10<canvas>: too complex imo. and it requires javascript 7/10<caption>: another one people forget about. not very useful 6/10<cite>: citation. Seems kinda useless to me 5/10<code>: fun 8/10<col>: a column 7/10<colgroup>: why 5/10<data>: what does this even do?? 5/10<datalist>: bruh just use a dropdown menu 7/10<dd>: why is this needed 5/10<del>: what the heck if text is deleted it should be removed, not kept 3/10<details>: actually underrated. This should be added to wasteof.money 9/10<dfn>: makes no sense whatsoever 2/10<dialog>: I love this one 10/10<div>: useful 9/10<dl>: even less useful than<dd>. 1/10<dt>: bruh why 2/10<em>: wait bruh why not just use <i> 3/10<embed>: use iframe imo 6/10<fieldset>: idk about this one 7/10<figcaption>: why couldn’t they just use the normal caption element? 3/10<figure>: why do you need this? there’s other options they could have done 2/10<footer>: cool and useful 8/10<form>: one of the most useful tags ever 10/10<h1> to <h6>: different levels of headings. I think it should have been css but eh whatever 6.5/10<head>: kinda cool 6/10<header>: the same as <footer> 8/10<hr>: dang that’s actually kinda cool. I didn’t know about it until this. Imma have to use it some 8/10<html>: ok 7/10<i>: italics ok 8/10<iframe>: cool but they added so many restrictions that it’s not as good anymore 7/10<img>: images are great 10/10<input>: cool 8/10<ins>: just like <del>, why in the world is this needed?? 3/10<kbd>: actually kinda cool 7/10<label>: pretty cool but they should have used it for more than just inputs 7/10<legend>: could they not have used <label>???? bruh 3/10<li>: pretty cool 9/10<link>: idk why they needed this but ok 6/10<main>: eh 7/10<map>: complicated 6/10<mark>: highlights are very cool 9/10<marquee>: the king of all html 147/10<meta>: eh 7/10<meter>: this actually looks really cool and underused wow 10/10<nav>: navbar be like 8/10<noscript>: kinda sad that there are still people who don’t use javascript but whatever 6/10<object>: what the heck just use iframe<ol>: not much to say here 7/10<optgroup>: they could have done this another way but eh 8/10<option>: an option in a dropdown list 7/10<output>: what is the use of this?? still it’s pretty cool 8/10<p>: nothing like the classics amirite 9/10<param>: seems like this should just be an attribute 2/10<picture>: that’s actually kinda cool idk 6/10<pre>: eh 7/10<progress>: whoa I didn’t know about this one and it looks really cool 10/10<q>: why not use <blockquote>??? 4/10<rp>: kinda like noscript, just there for compatibility 6/10<rt>: basically it explains East Asian text 7/10<ruby>: I like this one’s name 8/10<s>:strikethrough be like 7/10<samp>: this also looks really cool and underrated 9/10<script>: one of the best tags ever 11/10<section>: why not use a <div>?? 5/10<select>: personally I really like this one. I like dropdown lists 9/10<small>: should have been css but whatever 6/10<source>: why not use the src attribute??<span>: another one that should just be a div<strong>: bold text. but you should just use <b> 4/10<style>: css is hard to use but it makes stuff look cool 7/10<sub>: subscripted text be like 8/10<svg>: kinda cool but a bit hard to use 7/10<table>: an underused element 7/10<tbody>: 6/10<td>: why did they name it “td” for a table cell?? 7/10<template>: I don’t understand this one 5/10<textarea>: pretty cool 8/10<tfoot>: 6/10<th>: header cell in a table 7/10<thead>: 6/10<time>: doesn’t do anything special 7/10<title>: 5/10<tr>: row in a table 7/10<track>: idk tbh 6/10<u>: underline be like 8/10<ul>: unordered list 7/10<var>: math be like 8/10<video>: video is great 10/10<wbr>: when there might be a line break but you’re not quite sure 7/10
This list is a joke
It isn’t even funny. Seriously, there should be a repost limit (like 5 or 7.)
I seriously don’t understand why people make repost chains, they’re just long and clog up your feed
it angers jeffalo
I don't understand the appeal of re-post chains.